Former player shares his thoughts on Darryl Sutter as a person and information on how he used to punish his team after a loss

The termination of Darryl Sutter came as a surprise to a lot of people in the NHL. Sutter was yet to begin a 2-year extension with an annual value of around $4,000,000 per year. This means the Calgary Flames chose to pay Sutter $8,000,000 to not coach the team, rather than utilize his services within the organization. Reports have stated this decision was heavily influenced by exit interviews from players who all but refused to return with Sutter in place.

The decision however did create some questions, it was previously reported that Brad Treliving's decision to not return to Calgary, was heavily based around his inability to replace Sutter. Now the Flames find themselves as a team with a new arena deal, but no coach or General Manager to help build for its eventual opening. So why was it so important to terminate Sutter?

Well a post that showed up online yesterday may shed some light on it. A report surfaced from The Sports Aux, which is a Hockey Recruitment platform. The website allows players, once verified, to provide feedback on their coaches. The website details the process as follows:


So what was said about Sutter? Well one former player had this to say:



This review of Sutter seems to align rather closely with what a lot of players have said over their careers. His treatment of players like Jakob Pelletier this season were likely just the icing on the cake. While Sutter has proven in the past that his style can work, he's also a coach with a very short shelf life. Players today don't want to be belittled by a coach and sometimes as a coach you have to figure out a way to evolve your style.