Patrick Roy's reaction to the Islanders' no-goal said everything

The Islanders head coach wanted no part of reliving the goalie-interference call after the game.

That alone told the story. Roy was not in the mood to soften it, spin it, or pretend the bench saw a fair result.

Asked again about the play, Roy tried to shut the door on the topic: «Can you change the subject, please? Can we talk about something else?»

That was not the sound of a coach who felt the league got it right. It sounded like someone who knew exactly what he thought and had already said enough.

Roy's bigger point was blunt too. He argued Olivier pushed Anders into the net and then put the puck in himself after it first hit the stick.

That is why these calls keep driving people crazy. Players, coaches, and fans still do not see a clean standard from one goalie-interference ruling to the next.

This is the part nobody can pin down. One crease battle gets called incidental, the next one gets erased, and the reaction is the same every time.

The rule still feels too open to interpretation, especially when a legal net-front battle suddenly turns into a no-goal after a review.

That tension lands harder on a team like New York. The Islanders are 37-23-5, so every late whistle carries real weight in a packed race.

They have also gone 7-3-0 in their last 10, which makes a disputed no-goal sting even more when the standings are this tight.

New York has scored 192 goals and allowed 186. There is not much room for offense to get wiped off the board on a call nobody agrees on.

That is why Roy's reaction hit home. For the Islanders, this was not just one waved-off goal. It was another reminder that goalie interference still feels murky when the pressure is highest.

Also read on Blade of steel :
Mikko Rantanen's return could change everything for the injury-hit Stars