"At the hearing, Mr. Perron repeatedly attempted to justify his actions as warranted intervention on behalf of a teammate and that he only intended to start a scrum. I reject that justification. NHL hockey is a physical game that sometimes results in physical confrontations. However, it is disingenuous to suggest that the cross-check here was merely intended to start a scrum. Mr. Perron could have verbally challenged Mr. Zub, but he did not.
2. He could have pushed or jabbed him or even dropped his gloves to fight, but he did not. Had he chosen other options to support his teammate he might still have been penalized, but the episode may have ended without supplementary discipline."